Marcel Latak vs Noah Schachter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Nov at 07:24 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Latak vs N. Schachter

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Latak 1 - 0 Schachter
They have played 3 sets in total, with Marcel Latak winning 2 and Noah Schachter winning 1. The last match between Marcel Latak and Noah Schachter was at the Champaign Challenger, 09-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Marcel Latak getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Latak | 1 |
| Schachter | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Champaign Challenger(11-09-25)
M. Latak vs N. Schachter H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 100.00% (1-0) | Career Total W/L | 51.41% (128-121) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Latak vs N. Schachter Match Preview:
- Noah Schachter demonstrates superior recent performance on second serve points, securing 41.44%, while Marcel Latak has a concerning 0% win rate. Could this be pivotal in determining the likely winner?
- Return game analysis reveals Noah Schachter's dominance in recent form, winning 47.51% on second serve returns and 26.55% on first serves, compared to Marcel Latak who scores 0% in both areas.
- Under pressure, Schachter excels by saving 48.97% of breakpoints, unlike Latak who has not saved any, which could influence in-game outcomes.
- Overall match performance shows Schachter with a 43.10% win rate over the last year, while Latak remains winless.
- Schachter's best surface is Hard courts, where his career win percentage is notably higher than on Indoor Hard, possibly impacting event outcomes given the surface.
- Schachter participates frequently in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 47.37% of these matches. In contrast, Latak has not secured any victories, largely due to not playing matches.
- The quality of opponents faced by Schachter is significantly higher, with an average rank of 79.02, indicating exposure to more challenging competition.
- In deciding sets over the past year, Schachter has a 44% success rate, adding a potential edge, especially if the match becomes tightly contested.
Editorial Prediction (November 9, 2025, UTC):
Analysis of recent performance statistics presents a clear advantage for Noah Schachter. His proficiency in converting second serve points and a strong return game underscores a competitive edge in this matchup.
Schachter's ability to handle pressure, evidenced by his breakpoint savings, and his solid performance history on Hard courts further bolsters his standing as the stronger contender.
Additionally, Schachter’s experience against higher-ranked opponents coupled with his track record in deciding sets suggests resilience and readiness to outmaneuver Marcel Latak, who struggles across similar metrics.
Given these factors, Noah Schachter is the likely candidate to triumph in the upcoming tennis match.
Marcel Latak vs Noah Schachter Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Latak vs N. Schachter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 18 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:19:41 | Average Match Time | 2:19:41 |
| 63% (64/102) | 1st Serve % | 59% (66/112) |
| 64% (41/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (46/66) |
| 50% (19/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (18/46) |
| 26% (5/19) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (3/9) |
| 43% (48/112) | Return Points Win % | 41% (42/102) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Latak Recent Matches Played
N. Schachter Recent Matches Played

M. Latak vs N. Schachter Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100.00% (1/0) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.41% (128/121) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.76% (294/274) |
| 57.14% (16/12) | Games Win/Loss | 51.18% (2710/2585) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.13% (86/70) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.62% (30/33) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (12/18) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1 | Aces Total | 792 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 620 |
| 2:19:41 | Average Match Time | 1:15:59 |
| 798 | Average Opponent Rank | 354.49 |
| 63% (64/102) | 1st Serve % | 60% (7359/12210) |
| 64% (41/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5033/7359) |
| 50% (19/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2250/4851) |
| 26% (5/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (481/1182) |
| 43% (48/112) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4795/12116) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Challenger W/L | 37.50% (15/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 54.07% (113/96) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (127/247) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (24/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (32/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (131/110) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (131/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (118/18) |